Abstract

A crucial concern for the progress of every society is the relationship between KM and medicine. Information creation and the identification of potential predictors of expertise behavior are crucial to the long-term success of any hospital's approach to intellectual capital. It has been suggested that managers might benefit from using KM practices in order to improve the efficiency of medical facilities such as hospitals. This paper's goal is to provide a reliable and accurate survey on KM in hospital environments. With the help of a comprehensive literature analysis and input from health experts, they create a new understanding survey. By conducting further research, we were able to narrow down the AKMI measurements to their essential components and confirm that they had correctly identified the items. Finally, the phonetic features of the new instrument are discussed. The proposed survey seems valid, trustworthy, and appropriate for use in examining the nine identified elements of KM: views of KM, intrinsic and extrinsic motives, information integration and distribution, collaboration, leadership, corporate culture, and hurdles. Health system performance may be enhanced with the use of the proposed question by providing legislators and health workers with data about KM activities in health systems.

Keywords

• Strategic Knowledge Management,
• Manufacturing Firm,
• Knowledge Implication,
• Business knowledge

References

• • Ying Liao, Robert S., & Norton, David P. 2019. The Execution Premium: Linking Strategy to Operations for Competitive Advantage. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
• • Tsang, Stuart. 2020. The Origins of Order: Self-organization and Selection in Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
• • Denisi, Stylianos, & Kovach, Jeremy. 2019 Innovation at Cooper Lighting 2.0: Continuous Improvement of the Innovation Process? Atlanta, GA: Working Case at Georgia Institute of Technology.
• • Virtainlahti, Barbara W, & Hitt, Michael A. 2019 A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, .
• • Hislop, Sunder, & Srinivasan, Kannan. 2017. Broader product line: a necessity to achieve success? Management Science.
• • Tang, Mikko, & Jokinen, Mikko. 2021. Strategy, uncertainty and the focused factory in international process manufacturing. Journal of Operations Management.
• • Hasan Alizar, Naveen, & Poulsen, Annette B. 2018. Managers of financially distressed firms: villains or scapegoats? The Journal of Finance.
• • Serrat, W Chan, Hwang, Peter, & Burgers, Willem P. 2020. Multinationals’ diversification and the risk-return trade-off. Strategic Management Journal.
• • Ferraresi, Jean-Jacques, & Martimort, David. 2021. The Theory of Incentives I: The Principal-Agent Model. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Lal, Rajiv, & Srinivasan, V. 1993. Compensation Plans for Single- and Multi-product Salesforces: An Application of the Holmstrom-Milgrom Model. Management Science.
• • Abuabbous, Joseph, & Giachetti, Claudio. 2018. International diversification on manufacturing operations: Performance implications and moderating forces. Journal of Operations Management.
• • Jacson, Christoph H., & Bode-Greuel, Kerstin. 2017. Evaluating growth options as sources of value for pharmaceutical research projects. R&D Management.
• • Olusanva, Christoph H., & Kavadias, Stylianos. 2021. Implementing strategy through projects. Pages 225–251 of: Morris, Peter W. G., Pinto, Jeffrey K., & Soderlund, Jonas (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Project Management. Oxford: Oxford University.
• • Tseng, Christoph H., & Tapper, U.A. Steffan. 2020 Implementing a strategy-driven performance measurement system for an applied research group. Journal of Product Innovation Management.
• • Hrebiniak, Christoph H., & Terwiesch, Christian. 2018. Handbook of New Product Development Management. Ch: Coordination and Information Exchange: Butterworth Heinemann.
• • Drucker, Celine, & Llerena, Daniel. 2020. Green Consumer Behaviour: an Experimental Analysis of Willingness to Pay for Remanufactured Products. Business Strategy and the Environment.
• • Ali, Jurgen. 2019. Incentives in New Product Development Projects and the Role of Target Costing. Management Science.
• • Sawy, Paul, & Roberts, John. 2021. Rationalizability, Learning, and Equilibrium in Games with Strategic Complementarities. Econometrica.
• • Edward, C. Chet, ogilvie, dt, & Glick, William H. 2019 Assessing the external environment: an enrichment of the archival tradition. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management.
• • Gupta, Yuri, Pollock, Timothy G, & Porac, Joseph F. 2020. Are more resources always better for growth? Resource stickiness in market and product expansion. Strategic Management Journal.
• • Liao, Sanjog, Nair, Harikesh S, & Daljord, Øystein. 2018. Homogenous Contracts for Heterogeneous Agents: Aligning Salesforce Composition and Compensation. Working Paper.
• • Saisuthanawit, Mark, & Krause, Daniel R. 2018. Re-exploring the relationship between flexibility and the external environment. Journal of Operations Management.
• • Davenpork, Krishna. 2020. Diversification Strategy, Profit Performance, and the Entropy Measure. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), 239–255.
• • Lioria, Leslie E., Cardinal, Laura B., & Miller, C. Chet. 2018. Curvilinearity in teh Diversification-Performance Linkage: An Examination of Over Three Decades of Research. Strtategic Management Journal, 21(2), 155–174.
• • Al-Ali, Cerag, Ferguson, Mark, & Toktay, L. Beril. 2018. Remanufacturing under Warranty and Consumer Returns. Working Paper.
• • Branes, Dirk. 2020. Project Management for New Product Development. Project Management Journal.
• • Storey, Michael. 2019 Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Simon and Schuster.
• • Kruger, Gongming, Khoury, Theodore A., Peng, Mike W., & Qian, Zhengming. 2017 The Performance Implications of Intra- And Inter-Regional Geographic Diversification. Strategic Management Journal.
• • Schutz, Kamalini. 2020. Managing Product Variety: An Integrative Review and Research Directions. Production and Operations Management.
• • Musshref, J, & Wally, Stefan. 2019. Strategic decision speed and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal.
• • Crargallo Castel, Julio J., & Saloner, Garth. 2019. Benefits of Narrow Business Strategies. The American Economic Review.
• • Kruger, Caroline. 2021. Datamonitor Analyst: Product failure is the Area 51 of the food industry.
• • Ratique, David G, Hitt, Michael A, & Ireland, R Duane. 2018. Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review.
• • Janepuengporn, Wickham. 2019. Manufacturing - missing link in corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review.
• • Sokkar, Wickham. 2017. The focused factory. Harvard Business Review.
• • Doate, Shara. 2020. Intel Cuts Its Outlook; Giant Blames Thai Flood for $1 Billion Drop in Sales Goal. The Wall Street Journal.
• • Muhammad, Bob. 2021. Deere Bets Big on Expanding Global Demand. The Wall Street Journal.
• • Ray, Honnold, Vincent, & Wise, Jeremy. 2018. Remanufactured Goods: An Overview of the U.S. and Global Industries, Markets, and Trade.
• • Wheelen, Stephen. 2016. Advertising with subjective horizontal and vertical product differentiation. Review of Industrial Organization.
• • Mclnemey, C. (2019). Knowledge Management and the Dynamic Nature of Knowledge.
• • Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.
• • 53(12), 1009-1018.
• • Hansen, M. and Haas, M. (2018). Different Knowledge, Different Benefits: Toward A
• • Productivity Perspective On Knowledge Sharing In Organizations. Academy of Management Proceeding.
• • Schulz, M. and Lobe, A. 1. (2018). Codification and Tacitness As K M Strategies
• • An Empirical Exploration. Journal of High Technology Management Research 12,139-165.
• • Neely, A. (2019). Defining Performance Measurement: Adding to the Debate. Performance
• Measurement Association, 4(2), 14-15.
• • Keskin, H. (2020). The Relationships Between Explicit and Tacit Oriented K M Strategy,
• • and Firm Performance. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge. ProQuest
• Central pg. 169
• • Bapuji, H. and Crossan, M. (2021). From Raising Questions to Providing Answers:
• • Reviewing Organizational Learning Research. Management Learning, 35(4): 397-417.
• • Misterek, S.D.A., Schroeder, R.G. and Bates, K.A., The nature of the link between
• manufacturing strategy and organizational culture. In Manufacturing Strategy: Process
• and Content, edited by C.A. Voss, pp. 331–352, 2016 (London: Chapman & Hall).
• • Beckett, A.J., Wainwright, C.E.R. and Bance, D., Implementing an industrial continuous improvement system: A knowledge management case study. Industr. Manage. Data Syst., 2000, 100, 330–338.
• • Hitt, M. A., Dacin, M. T., Tyler, A. L., & Park, D. 1997. Understanding the differences
• in Korean and U.S. executives’ strategic orientations. Strategic Management Journal,
• : 159-167.
• • McKelvey, B. 1975. Guidelines for the empirical classification of organizations.
• Administrative Science Quarterly, 20: 509-525.
• • Venkatraman, N. 2015. Strategic orientation of business enterprises: the construct,
• dimensionality, and measurement. Management Science, 35: 942-962.
• • Davis, G. F., & Useem, M. 2019. Top management, company directors, and corporate
• control. In A. Pettigrew, H. Thomas, & R. Whittington (Eds.), Handbook of Strategy
• and Management. London: Sage.
• • Grewal, R., & Tansuhaj, P. 2017. Building organizational capabilities for managing
• economic crisis: The role of market orientation and strategic flexibility. Journal of
• Marketing, 65: 67-80.
• • Chun, R. 2016. European Journal of Marketing, Special edition: 'Corporate identity and
• corporate marketing'. Corporate Reputation Review, 4(3): 276-283.
• • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. 2018. A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm
• behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice(Fall): 7-25.
• • Hunt, S. D., & Lambe, C. J. 2018. Marketing's contribution to business strategy: Market
• orientation, relationship marketing and resource-advantage theory. International
• Journal of Management Reviews, 2(1):
• • McAdam, R. 2015. Knowledge management as a catalyst for innovation within
• organizations: A qualitative study. Knowledge and Process Management, 7(4): 233- 241.
• • Hennart, J.-F. 2017. A transaction costs theory of joint ventures. Strategic Management
• Journal, 9: 361-374.
• • Dyer, J. H., & Noboeka, K. 2019. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal,
• • Alavi, P.M. Integration of health and social care: A case of learning and knowledge management. Health Soc. Care Community 2020,
• • Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. 2020. The dynamics of alliance conditions in the alliance
• development process. Journal of Management Studies, 39: 725-746.
• • Kogut, B. 2018. The network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emergence of
• structure. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 405-425.
• • Barringer, B. R., & Harrison, J. S. 2018. Walking a tightrope: Creating value through
• interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management, 26: 367-403.
• • Michael, S., Storey, D., & Thomas, H. 2020. Discovery and coordination in strategic
• management and entrepreneurship. In M. A. Hitt, R. D. Ireland, S. M. Camp, & D. L.
• • Sexton (Eds.), Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating a New Mindset. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
• • Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N., Velamuri, R., & Venkataraman, S. 2016. Three Views of entrepreneurial opportunity. In Z. J. Acs, & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of
• • Entrepreneurship Research: An Interdisciplinary Survey and Introduction: 141-
• Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
• • Miller, K. D. 2017. Knowledge inventories and managerial myopia. Strategic
• Management Journal, 23(8): 689-706.
• • Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A.2017. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action
• Perspective: Addison-Wesley.
• • Alamsjah, F. (2020) Key Success Factors in Implementing Strategy: Middle-Level Managers’ Perspectives. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 1444-1450
• • Lukas, B. A., & Ferrell, O. C. 2019. The effect of market orientation on product innovation. Journal of the Academy of Market Science, 28: 239-247.
• • Fiol, C. M. 2016. Revisiting an identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 27: 691-699.
• • Peters, T. 2017. Liberation Management. New York: Pan Books.
• • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Santos, F. M. 2019. Knowledge-based view: A new theory of strategy? In A. Pettigrew, H. Thomas, & R. Whittington (Eds.), Handbook of Strategy and Management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• • Madhavan, R., Gynawali, D. R., & He, J. 2017. Two's company, three's a crowd? Triads in cooperative-competitive networks. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6): 918- 927.
• • Inkpen, A. C. 2018. Learning, knowledge management, and strategic alliances: So many
• • studies, so many unanswered questions. In F. J. Contractor, & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative Strategies and Alliances: 267-290. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
• • Lei, D. 2019. Competence-building, technology fusion and competitive advantage.
• International Journal of Technology Management, 14(4): 208-237.
• • Nonaka, I., Reinmoller, P., & Toyama, R. 2018. Integrated information technology systems for knowledge creation. In M. Dierkes, A. B. Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka
• • (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge: 827-848. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• • Patriotta, G. 2019. On studying organizational knowledge. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 2: 3-12
• • Ford, C. M. 2020. The futurity of decisions as a facilitator of organizational creativity and
• change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(6): 635-646.
• • Tanriverdi, H. 2019. Information technology relatedness, knowledge management capability, and performance of multibusiness firms. MIS Quarterly, 29(2): 311-334.
• • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Santos, F. M. 2019. Knowledge-based view: A new theory of strategy? In A. Pettigrew, H. Thomas, & R. Whittington (Eds.), Handbook of Strategy and Management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• • Barney, J. (2017), “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 99-120.
• • Heisig, P., Suraj, O.A., Kianto, A., Kemboi, C., Arrau, G.P. and Easa, N.F. (2016), “Knowledge management and business performance: global experts’ views on future research needs”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 20 No. 6.
• • Patterson, W. and Ambrosini, V. (2017), “Configuring absorptive capacity as a key process for research intensive firms”, Technovation, Vols 36/37.
• • Hrebiniak, L. G. (2006). Obstacles to Strategy Implementation. Organizational Dynamics, 35(1)
• • Davenport, T., D.W. De Long, and M.C. Beers, Successful Knowledge Management
• Projects. Sloan Management Review, Winter 2017:
• • Hill, C.W.L. and G.R. Jones, Strategic Mangement: An Integrated Approach. 5th Edition ed. 2018, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
• • Bierly, P. and A. Chakrabarti, Generic Knowledge Strategies in the U.S. Pharmaceutical
• • Industry, in Knowledge and Strategy, M.H. Zack, Editor.2017, Butterworth Heinemann: Boston.
• • Choi, B. and H. Lee, An Empirical Investigation of KM Styles and Their Effects on
• • Corporate Performance. Information & Management, 2018(in press).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.