Image
volume 07  issue 02

The Analysis of China's economic development and its relationship to reform policies: The Analysis of China's economic development and its relationship to reform policies

Abstract

The majority of explanatory models of democracy point to the economy as a forerunner to major political liberalisation, with either severe economic crises or fast economic development seen as the dominant cause element. Chinese Communist Party leaders, on the other hand, have managed to escape the socialist social compact with the urban working class without giving up their hold on power. What's more, China's economy has grown rapidly for nearly twenty-five years without any major political reform. Understanding China's post-1978 reform measures requires comparing it to other high-growth East Asian countries and also to other forms of socialist transition, such as Eastern Europe and Russia. China's success in implementing economic reform without jeopardising political control hinges in large part on how and when it liberalises its foreign direct investment (FDI) market. China's ownership diversification pattern and China's style of integration into the global economy are two significant factors in this comparative research. This paper examines the impact of FDI liberalisation on worker-party relations and how these two factors contribute to the achievement of economic transformation without political liberalisation. When applied to China, "reform and openness" has sped up state building, undermined civil society (particularly labour), and slowed down political liberalisation.

Keywords
  • Economic,
  • China Economic,
  • Reform Policies,
  • China's Economic Development
References
  • • Yun-wing Sung and Thomas M. H. Chan (1987). China's Economic Reforms: The Debates in China. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, (17), 29–51. doi:10.2307/2158967
  • • Glanzel, W., Danell, R., & Persson, O. (2003). The decline of Swedish neuroscience—Decomposing a bibliometric national science indicator. Scientometrics, 57(2), 197–213.
  • • Glanzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2003). A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics, 56(3), 357–367.
  • • Garg, A. X., Hackam, D., & Tonelli, M. (2008). Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: When One Study Is Just not Enough. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 3(1), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.01430307
  • • Chen, S. (2002). Economic Reform and Social Change in China: Past, Present, and Future of the Economic State. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 15(4), 569–589. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20020136
  • • Zeng Peiyan, (2017) "Report on the Implementation of the National Economic and Social Development Plan for FY1998 and the Draft of National Economic and Social Development Plan for FY1999" [in Chugoku Tsushin (China Daily News), Chugoku Tsushinsha,].
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

YANG LINGLIN, Y. L., & DR. ABHIJIT GHOSH , D. A. G. . (2024). The Analysis of China’s economic development and its relationship to reform policies: The Analysis of China’s economic development and its relationship to reform policies. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 7(02), 220–226. Retrieved from https://ijmras.com/index.php/ijmras/article/view/749

Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.