The aim of this research was determine the energy and water use efficiencies under the modification of closed circuit drip Flood organizations designs. Field experiments carried out on transgenic maize (GDH, LL3), (Zea Mays crop) under two types of closed Circle:

1) One manifold for lateral lines or Closed Circle with One Mani-fold of Drip Flood organization (CM1DIS);

2) Closed Circle with Two Manifolds of Drip Irrigation organization (CM2DIS), and

3) Traditional Drip Flood organization (TDIS) as a control. Three lengths of lateral lines were used, 40, 60, and 80 meters. PE tubes lateral lines: 16 mm diameter; 30 cm emitters distance, and GR built-in emitters 4 lap when operating pressure 1 bar under two levels slope conditions 0% and 2%. Ex- pediments were conducted at the Agric. Res. Fields., Soil and Plant & Agric. Organization Dept., Agric. Faculty, Southern Illinois University, Car- bondable (SIUC), Illinois, USA. Under 0% level slope when using CM2DIS the increase percent of Vitality Use Efficiency (EUE) were 32.27, 33.21, and 34.37% whereas with CM1DIS were 30.84, 28.96, and 27.45% On the other hand
when level slope 2% were with CM2DIS 31.57, 33.14, and 34.25 while CM1DIS were 30.15, 28.98, and 27.53 under lateral lengths 40, 60 and 80 m respectively relative to TDIS. Water Use Efficiency (WUE) when level slope 0% under CM2DIS were 1.67, 1.18, and 0.87 kg/m3 com- pared to 1.65, 1.16, and 0.86 kg/m3 with CM1DIS and 1.35, 1.04, and 0.75 kg/m3 with TDIS whereas with level slope 2% when using CM2DIS were 1.76, 1.29, and 0.84 kg/m3 compared to 1.77, 1.30, and 0.87 kg/m3 with CM1DIS and 1.41, 1.12, and 0.76 kg/m3 (for lateral lengths 40, 60, and 80 meters respectively). Water Reduction percent varied widely within individual lateral lengths and between circuit types relative to TDIS. Under slope 0% level CM2DIS water Reduction percent values were 19.26, 12.48, and 14.03%; with CM1DIS they were 18.51, 10.50,
and 12.78%; and under slope level 2% with CM2DIS they were 19.93, 13.26, and 10.38% and
CM1DIS were 20.49, 13.96, and 13.23% (for lateral lengths 40, 60, 80 meters respectively). The Vitality use efficiency and water Reduction were observed under CM2DIS and CM1DIS when using the shortest lateral length 40 meters, then lateral length 60 meters, while the lowest value was observed when using lateral length 80 meters this result depends on the physical and hydraulic characteristics of the emitters, lateral line uniformity, and friction losses. CM2DIS was more Vitality use efficiency, EUE, water Reduction, and WUE than either CM1DIS or TDIS.


Drip Flood, Closed Circle, Vitality Use Efficiency, Water Use Efficiency.


1] International Vitality Annual (EIA), Projection, organization for the Analysis of Global Vitality Markets.

[2] Pimentel, D. and Giampietro, M. (1994) Food, Land, Population and the U.S. Economy. Carrying Capacity Network.

[3] Keller, J. (2002) Evolution of drip/microFlood: Tradi-tional and non-traditional uses. Paper Presented as Key-note Address at the International Meeting on Advances in Drip/Micro Flood, 2 to, Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife.

[4] Reyes, M.R. Agroforestry and sustainable vegetable production in Southeast Asian watersheds. Annual Report, SANREM-CRSP, North Carolina A&T State University.

[5] Capra, A. and Scicolone, B. Water quality and distribution uniformity in drip/trickle Flood organizations. Journal of Agriculture Engineering Research,

[6] FAO Small-Scale pimped Flood; Vitality and cost. Kay, M., Silos Collage, U.K. and Hatch, N., FAO land and Water Development Division, pp. 5-40.

[7] Mizyed, N. and Kruse, E.G. Emitter discharge evaluation of subsurface trickle Flood organizations. Transactions of the ASAE.

[8] Kirnak, H., Dogan, E., Demir, S. and Yalcin, S. Determination of hydraulic performance of trickle irrigation emitters used in Flood organization in the Harran Plain.
H. A.-G. Mansour et al. / Agricultural Sciences Copyright © 2010 SciRes. Openly accessible at Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 28, 223- 230.

[9] ASAE Standards EP405.1 FEB03. Design and installation of microFlood organizations. ASAE, St. Joseph.

[10] Wu, I.P. and Gitlin, H.M. Hydraulics and uniform for drip Flood. Journal of the Flood and Drain-age Division,.



Scroll to Top