Azem Yahamed



Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a new rapid additive method to make3Dobjectswith exact shapes and structures. 3D printing is being used for a variety of applications, in-cluding automotive, medical, dental, aerospace, consumer goods, toys, novelty items, embedded electronics and appliances. The goal of this work was to investigate the smoothness, precision and topography of plastic materials that can be used for three-dimensional printing applications. These three performance characteristics are crucial to performance of any 3D printed product.Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) and Poly-Jet™ technology were used to produce 3D printed shapes for testing these perfor-mance measures for the different processes.

Three samples of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) were printed utilizing different numbers of layers. That is, one, two and three layers at a 45º (head angle) were printed.The angle is related to the direction of the printing, which is controlled automati-cally by Maker Ware software of the 3D printer itself, without any external control from the operator or technician. Thickness and roughness for each sample were subsequently measured. One sample of polylactic acid (PLA) was printed with one layer at 45º and its thickness and roughness were also measured. Two other samples of ABS, having one and two layers, were printed at 90º then thickness and smoothness were measured. Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) was printed with one layer at 45° and 90º. Digital ABS™ was printed at 6 different layer thicknesses. Thickness and roughness of printed 3D samples were measured using a White Light Interferometer.

The results show that the roughness of ABS at 45° and 90° increased with increasing thickness. The samples printed at 90° were smoother than at 45°, which means the orientation had a significant influence on roughness, but little on thickness. We found that the minimum thickness that Maker Bot can reach is 50 µm, while with Flash Forge it is 80 µm. The samples that were printed by Stratasys 500 Objet Connex3 were

smoother than those printed by Maker Bot replicator 2X and Flash Forge Creator Pro. Also, Stratasys 500 Objet Connex3 is more precise than either and it can reach thinner levels than either of them. However, the highest performance printer does not produce sufficient precision and smoothness for most 3D printing applications.


3D Printed Structures, Precision, Topography, Roughness


1. Charles Bell,Maintaining and Troubleshooting Your 3D Printer, Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2014.

2. Barry Berman, 3-D printing: The new industrial revolution, Business Horizons (2012) 55, 155—162.

3. David Espalin & Danny W. Muse & Eric MacDonald & Ryan B. Wicker, 3D Printing multifunctionality: structures with electronics, Int J Adv. Manuf. Technol. (2014) 72:963–978.

4. Robert Bogue, (2013) “3D printing: the dawn of a new era in manufacturing?”, As-sembly Automation, Vol. 33 Issue: 4, pp. 307-311.

5. Stevanovic, S., Chavanne, P., Braissant, O., Pieles, U., and Gruner, P. (2013). Im-provement of Mechanical Properties of 3d Printed Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds by Polymeric Infiltration. Bioceram Dev Appl S, 1, 2.

6. Kern R., 3-D Printed Implants Hit The Market, Pave The Way For More Personalized Devices, The Gray Sheet, 39, Nov 4, 2013, Retrieved 12/06/2016 from http://tissuesys.com/trs_media/publications/The_Gray_Sheet_3D_Printer.pdf.

7. Ahn, S. H., Montero, M., Odell, D., Roundy, S., and Wright, P. K. (2002). Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 8(4), 248-257.

8. Aitor Cazón, Paz Morer, Luis Matey, “PolyJet technology for product prototyping: Tensile strength and surface roughness properties”, Journal of Engineering Manufac-ture, 228, pp1664-1675, 2014.

9. Adam E Jakus, Alexandra L Rutz and Ramille N Shah, Advancing the field of 3D biomaterial printing, Biomed. Mater. 11 (2016).

10. Hutmacher, D. W., Schantz, T., Zein, I., Ng, K. W., Teoh, S. H., and Tan, K. C. (2001). Mechanical properties and cell cultural response of polycaprolactone scaffolds designed and fabricated via fused deposition modeling. Journal of biomedical materials research, 55(2), 203-216.

11. Vince Cahill, “A Very Brief History of Industrial Inkjet Printing”, ScreenWeb, posted Wed Oct 28, 2015, downloaded 6/6/17 from http://www.screenweb.com/content/a-very-brief-history-industrial-inkjet-printing?page=0,3 – .WExU68n_o1g.

12. Groth, C., Kravitz, N. D., Jones, P. E., Graham, J. W., and Redmond, W. R. (2014). Three-dimensional printing technology. J Clin. Orthod., 48(8), 475-485.

13. Mavrogenis, A. F., Dimitriou, R., Parvizi, J., & Babis, G. C. (2009). Biology of implant osseointegration. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact, 9(2), 61-71.

14. Novaes Jr, A. B., Souza, S. L. S. D., Barros, R. R. M. D., Pereira, K. K. Y., Iezzi, G., & Piattelli, A. (2010). Influence of implant surfaces on osseointegration. Brazilian Dental Journal, 21(6), 471-481

15. Alla, R. K., Ginjupalli, K., Upadhya, N., Shammas, M., Ravi, R. K., & Sekhar, R. (2011). Surface roughness of implants: a review. Trends in Biomaterials and Artificial Organs, 25(3), 112-118.

16. Wennerberg, A. (1999). The role of surface roughness for implant incorporation in bone. Cells and Materials, 9(1),1.

17. ABS Material Data Sheet, retrieved 04/15/2014 from http://teststandard.com/data_sheets/ABS_Data_sheet.pdf.

18. Bijarimi, M., Ahmad, S., and Rasid, R. (2012). Mechanical, thermal and morphologi-cal properties of PLA/PP melt blends. In International Conference on Agriculture, Chemical and Environmental Sciences (ICACES 2012) (pp. 6-7).

19. Jelinska, N., Kalnins, M., Tupureina, V., and Dzene, A. (2010). Poly (vinyl alco-hol)/poly (vinyl acetate) blend films. Sci. J. of Riga Techn. Univ., Mater. Sci. Appl. Chem, 1, 55-61.

20. Rosidah Sam, Kamarul Arrifin, Norlida Buniyamin, Simulation of Pick and Place Robotics System Using SolidworksSoftmotion, 2012 International Conference on System Engineering and Technology, September 11-12, 2012, Bandung, Indonesia.

21. Azem Yahamed, Pavel Ikonomov, Paul D. Fleming, Alexandra Pekarovicova, Peter Gustafson,Arz Qwam Alden and Saif Alrafeek “Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Polymers”, J. Print Media Tech. Res., iVol. V – No. 4 (273–290), December 2016.

22. Azem Yahamed, Pavel Ikonomov, Paul D. Fleming, Alexandra Pekarovicova, and Peter Gustafson, “Designed structures for bone replacement”, J. Print Media Tech. Res.Vol. V – No. 4 (291–308), December 2016.

23. Fedorov, A., Beichel, R., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Finet, J., Fillion-Robin, J. C., Pujol, S., and Kikinis, R. (2012). 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magnetic resonance imaging, 30(9), 1323-1341.

24. Michael J. Joyce, Paul D. Fleming III, Alexandra Pekarovicova and Massood Zandi Atashbar, “Self-Supported Printed Multi-Layer Capacitors”, J. Print Media Tech. Res., 4, (2015) 4, 285-200


Department of Chemical and Paper Engineering Western Michigan University; Kalamazoo, Michigan 49008-546

Department of Design Western Michigan University; Kalamazoo, Michigan 49008-546.

Department of Manufacturing, and Management Systems Engineering.

Department of Manufacturing, and Management Systems Engineering, Western Michigan University; Kalamazoo, Michigan 49008-546.

Scroll to Top